The implicit assumption that underlies the cavalier attitude surrounding this entire vaccination-by-novel-biotechnology push is the claim that vaccines don’t have delayed-onset long term effects, and so having no evidence of long term effects in this new technology (on account of a deafening lack of data in that regard) is grounds for dismissal of any concerns. I have read a number of “fact checks” downplaying concerns raised by conscientious doctors and researchers on account of them “lacking evidence” (again, absurdly using the lack of data on this biotech as a defense of it) despite the presentation of genuinely plausible mechanisms. Even leaving aside the debate of whether vaccines do or do not have delayed-onset long term effects, it doesn’t take a world-class logician to immediately see the issue here.
No news is not good news when it comes to novel technology, especially in medicine. You don’t just tamper with complex systems in a way that is more arbitrary than what occurs in coevolutionary processes and expect it to work out. In fact, you’d expect quite the opposite.
Below is a heavily abbreviated list of concerns that parents should take into account before vaccinating their children. It is by no means exhaustive.
Antibody dependent enhancement or ADE
“Antibody-dependent enhancement (ADE), sometimes less precisely called immune enhancement or disease enhancement, is a phenomenon in which binding of a virus to suboptimal antibodies enhances its entry into host cells, followed by its replication.[1][2]”
Antibody dependent enhancement is an incredibly dangerous phenomenon, and is a major contributing factor to the fact that we had never successfully made a vaccine for a coronavirus prior to 2020. [And this is above and beyond the separate issues involved with these novel platforms]
Theoretically one of the biggest risk factors for antibody dependent enhancement is viral mutation.
And we should be clear that these vaccines are spike protein-only vaccines. There’s nothing more robust about them. They are for the spike protein, the antigen, and the response is just the antibodies to that antigen, and if there are changes, and the antibodies no longer bind as adeptly to those changes, they are imperfectly binding antigens. Again, historically, we have had incredible issues with vaccines for coronaviruses, and it has been credited to this exact phenomenon.
It’s a huge risk, and it doesn’t go away.
The fact that we were hard sold mass vaccination with a leaky vaccine in this variable environment given the pervasiveness of the precedent is nothing short of astounding.
Autoimmunity
Homology between human and viral proteins is an established factor in viral- or vaccine-induced autoimmunity.
Work by James Lyons-Weiler and Aristo Vojdani show convincingly that the theoretical risk of autoimmune issues from the material we’re working with is substantial, and some of these issues wouldn’t manifest for years.
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32292901/ [duplicate]
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1521661620304253?via%3Dihub [duplicate]
“These important findings need to be emphasized. Antibodies with a high binding affinity to SARS-CoV-2 spike and other proteins also have a high binding affinity with tTG (associated with Celiac Disease), TPO (Hashimoto’s thyroiditis), myelin basic protein (multiple sclerosis), and several endogenous proteins. Unlike the autoimmune process associated with pathogen priming, these autoimmune diseases typically take years to manifest symptomatically.”
Biodistribution
It’s also important to keep in mind the biodistribution issues. While a respiratory infection will see substantial duress in, for example, the lungs, spike protein inundation from these shots distributes differently.
For example, if concentrations end up in the liver and spleen as appears to be the case, there is a well-facilitated connection to the vagus nerve which has associated with Parkinson’s.
“What Is the Evidence that Parkinson’s Disease Is a Prion Disorder, Which Originates in the Gut?” (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6274907/)
Will this end up in your most vital organs? Yes.
Will this end up in your brain? Yes.
Isn’t the brain one of our most vital organs?
You’d think, wouldn’t you?
https://trialsitenews.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/06/Pfizer-report_Japanese-government.pdf [charts in English on page 6]
Genotoxicity
More than a third of our genome is made up of poorly understood transposable elements which engage in a complex process of RNA to DNA conversion.
Epigenetic phenomena in general is a good example of the scantiness of our knowledge when it comes to our most intricate systems.
Not only do we not fully understand the nuclear membrane’s gating system, but the nuclear membrane also disappears entirely during mitosis and meiosis, or cell splitting, which happens all the time.
https://biomedres.us/pdfs/BJSTR.MS.ID.005501.pdf [translation, but recommended]
Integration has been shown possible (https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.12.12.422516v1, https://www.pnas.org/content/118/21/e2105968118), and we have many sources of endogenous reverse transcriptase. More broadly, there is the prospect of simple damage. The modifications that have been made to the mRNA involved and the fusion/permeation capacity of the lipid nanoparticle make for unknown potentiation of deleterious effects.
Considering the notorious tendency for far less invasive and unnatural phenomena to cause cancer, this risk cannot be downplayed. Some viruses are said to cause cancer, and yet viruses are also supposed to tend to lyse or bud out of the cell afterwards, in the process usually killing it. If an inordinate number of cells hijacked by this new technology were to be spared by the immune system, given the law of large numbers, what might we expect to happen later on? With current data, we simply don’t know. It’s not there. Any biologist who views the absence of data as a lack of cause for concern is not worthy of the title, and yet, that’s more or less precisely what the ones heralded by the media have all been professing, usually by vigorous handwaving.
Johnson and Johnson is not the safer alternative. For both J&J and Astra Zeneca, nuclear penetration is a feature, not a bug. And long term persistence with that mechanism in vivo has already been shown.
Novelty
They made a number of changes to these sequences. This is not what you’d consider an organic product.
For example, the makers substituted methyl-pseudouridine for all the uridine nucleotides. This is never seen in nature, and like most of the modifications, was done to increase stability, but if you’re reasonably concerned about unexpected consequences (as you should be when you take new, largely untested medication), that’s particularly disconcerting, because it increases the amount of time and expression with which something unintended might happen.
“Stabilising the Code” by Dr. Mike Williams is a harrowing read, and goes deeper into the issues than that of the stabilization itself:
Just as a reminder, the normal half-life of mRNA is supposed to be minutes:
“…our current measurements are consistent with the findings of Munchel et al. that long-lived (>1 SD above the mean) transcripts are functionally enriched for translation factors and that ribosomal protein-encoding mRNAs specifically are long lived as a group with an average half-life of 15.5 min (Figure 1—figure supplement 1.G; Figure 1—figure supplement 1.H) (Munchel et al., 2011).”
In Moderna’s literature, we’re looking at roughly 9 hours:
“The estimated half-life for mRNA after injection is approximately 8 to 10 hours”
(page 18)
That’s between one and two orders of magnitude of difference.
It’s not clear how much of that time is due to the various mRNA modifications or the polyethylene glycol, nor is it clear whether that is known, but that brings us to the next relevant point: We’re infusing our cells with polyethylene glycol.
PEG
Polyethylene glycol is the petrochemical being used to envelope the vaccine mRNA for the sake of clandestine entry into our cells.
Learning about polyethylene glycol drug delivery is a lot like learning about how sausage gets made. You see a lot of dead pigs.
The following is a presentation from Janos Szebeni, one of the leading experts in the field.
What he was demonstrating was porcine CARPA, which is Complement Activation Related Pseudoallergy as experimentally demonstrated in pigs, and is an incredibly dangerous consequence that can arise from dosing of PEG.
Sure enough, we are seeing levels of anaphylaxis that are significantly greater than those of other vaccines.
As a subtle acknowledgement of this fact, Science Mag put out an article early in the vaccine push stating that the U.S. National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) was concerned enough to convene several meetings… to discuss the allergic reactions with representatives of Pfizer and Moderna, independent scientists and physicians, and the Food and Drug Administration (FDA).” https://www.science.org/news/2020/12/suspicions-grow-nanoparticles-pfizer-s-covid-19-vaccine-trigger-rare-allergic-reactions
Szebeni was one of the leading researchers there, and admitted “the mechanism behind PEG-conjugated anaphylaxis is relatively unknown”. He also expressed concerns about “the long run”, in large part because PEG is particularly dangerous under repeat dosing.
The paper also has Alkis Togias, branch chief of allergy, asthma, and airway biology at NIAID, saying “Until we know there is truly a PEG story, we need to be very careful in talking about that as a done deal” which means like everything in this, they don’t want to talk about the perspicuous evidence of a link because they don’t want people to catch wind of indications that might make them wary of these drugs.
PEG is in other drugs and products, and we know it’s not biologically inert, because we’ve seen an increase in antibodies to it over the years, but it has never been used in a vaccine before, and what they’ve done is to package it into 40 trillion heat-seeking (figurative) envelopes all designed to gun for the interior of our cells.
Scrumptious.
Prions
It’s also well within the realm of reasonable consideration to be concerned about protein misfolding issues, which is another tenuous field.
Many neurodegenerative diseases, Alzheimer’s, Parkinson’s, and ALS, are considered in the realm of prion diseases.
Transmembrane glycine zippers, which these spikes possess, appear to be a vulnerability for the sort of misfolding that leads to prion disease. There’s also the novelty aspect that could increase potentiation; the mRNA vaccines replace two adjacent amino acids in the fusion domain with a pair of prolines in order to force the protein to remain in its open state, for example. We don’t know if this increases the potential for an issue to occur, but it could.
Reproductive organs
The testes have high levels of ACE2 expression. The lipid nanoparticles have been shown to go into the ovaries.
Despite the medical gaslighting, women are clearly going through intense and painful menstrual issues.
https://trialsitenews.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/06/Pfizer-report_Japanese-government.pdf [charts in English on page 6]
Vascular issues
Both of the following presentations are under ten minutes.
In summary, the expressed concern is that because blood slows down in the capillaries, that’s where a lot of the uptake (of vaccine nucleotide chain inputs) will occur, resulting in inordinate spike proteins in our smallest blood vessels, and leading to micro-clotting.
This is not an isolated concern. The same concern was expressed by the group of doctors who wrote a letter to EMA about potential clotting issues a week before over a dozen European countries suspended the use of Astra Zeneca for precisely the sort of issues they had mentioned.
https://doctors4covidethics.org/urgent-open-letter-from-doctors-and-scientists-to-the-european-medicines-agency-regarding-covid-19-vaccine-safety-concerns/ on February 28th.
Also by Stefanie Seneff PhD, who holds degrees in biology and computer science from MIT, and Yuichiro Suzuki, a professor who runs a lab at Georgetown.
The theory has, of course, been largely ignored like all potential issues of the vaccines, with a couple of line-toeing doctors even going so far as to suggest that because d dimer alone doesn’t necessarily mean something pathological, it can be treated as if it doesn’t mean anything at all.
However, let’s step out of bizarro world for just a minute and put things in perspective: two years ago, if a new drug was giving some significant portion of people elevated d dimer levels, wouldn’t you want it looked into? Wouldn’t anyone?
I think anyone arguing in good faith would agree with that. But I don’t know that we have many of those any more.
I can’t emphasize the relevance of the unique biodistribution enough. While they are also caustic and dangerous, humans have coexisted with respiratory illnesses forever. Our bodies can handle them generally, and tend to do better after exposure. You also don’t tend to die from COVID without two and a half other conditions that are liable to kill you as well.
Meanwhile, something in the realm of 30,000,000,000,000 molecules of modified mRNA being flushed into broader circulation is unheard of; if the capillary hypothesis is correct it would be a vaccine-related mechanism that would be biologically distinct even from loosely analogous forms of duress (including some issues associated with severe infections).
Then, of course, there are also the long-term issues that are already being downplayed even as they are acknowledged, such as myocarditis. There have been suggestions that what has been officially recognized as of yet is just the tip of the iceberg, and based on the second-dose correlation, the risk appears to increase with increased doses. Despite irresponsible suggestions to the contrary, as Anish Koka, a cardiologist in Philadelphia, put it plainly: “There is no such thing as mild symptomatic myocarditis that puts a young person in the hospital.”
For those skeptical that anything is being under-recognized by health agencies, an MSU professor posted a list (originally obtained from Ryan Cristian of The Last American Vagabond) of just shy of a hundred news articles of young athletes injured or dying of heart-related issues this year, often collapsing on the field. Something terrible is happening here.
And why, why exactly, are we taking these risks again?
NYT: “For children without a serious medical condition, the danger of severe Covid is so low as to be difficult to quantify. For children with such a condition, the danger is higher but still lower than many people believe.” [Emphasis bolding and italicization added]
Ah. It’s “difficult to quantify”. That’s why.
Bring out the mandates.